publications full of ideas
Cybersecurity Threats: What Retirement Plan Sponsors and Fiduciaries Need to Know – and Do

3.7.2017

What is the Risk?

The loss of employee personal information due to a cyber breach is an ever-increasing concern to all employers. After years of work to put into place protocols to comply with HIPAA’s requirements on protected health information, plan sponsors’ and service providers’ focus now is broadening to include protection of employee information maintained in connection with other types of benefit plans, including retirement plans. Retirement plan data — name, date of birth, address, Social Security number, compensation and other financial information — typically is maintained by the plan sponsor and provided to a plan record keeper and other plan service providers, and usually is sufficient to steal an employee’s identity.

The cost of a cybersecurity breach, including detecting the extent of the breach, recovering data and restoring systems integrity, can be substantial. In addition, a breach may trigger enforcement actions by governmental agencies, resulting in penalties arising under state or federal law, and potentially exposing the employer or plan service provider to civil claims under common law or various state statutes.

Regulatory Structure

While there is no comprehensive federal regulatory scheme governing cybersecurity for retirement plans and their service providers, many state laws, including North Carolina law, include breach notification and private rights of action for the unauthorized disclosure of protected personal information, and state attorney generals have been active in enforcing these laws in cyber breach cases. In addition, existing guidance under ERISA already recognizes the risks associated with the electronic communication of plan information. Under DOL Regulation Section 2520.104b-1(c) (addressing the electronic distribution of plan information to participants) and DOL Technical Release No. 2011-03 (dealing with a secure continuously available website used to communicate information about participant-directed investment alternatives under a retirement plan), a plan sponsor has an obligation to ensure the electronic system used protects the confidentiality of personal information relating to the individual’s accounts and benefits.

Whether cybersecurity is an ERISA fiduciary responsibility and whether ERISA preempts state cybersecurity laws remain important unanswered questions. A report on cybersecurity recently released by the DOL’s ERISA Advisory Council provides extensive information to plan sponsors, fiduciaries and plan service providers on approaches for managing cybersecurity risks, but highlights the need for additional clarification on the extent of plan sponsor and vendor responsibilities to protect participant information. However, the report includes the recommendation that plan sponsors and fiduciaries consider cybersecurity in safeguarding benefit plan data and assets and when making decisions to select or retain a plan service provider. The Council, an influential body that advises DOL on issues under ERISA, has been studying benefit plan cybersecurity issues since 2011. While the report’s recommendations do not have the force of law or regulation, in light of the broad scope of an ERISA fiduciary’s obligation to act with prudence and the resources the Council has directed at this issue, this report may represent the foundation for future regulatory or statutory efforts addressing plan sponsor and vendor fiduciary responsibility for cybersecurity matters. In addition, it could cited as a baseline standard-of-care in future tort actions by private plaintiffs.

Plan Sponsor and Fiduciary Action Steps

What should retirement plan sponsors and fiduciaries be doing now to address cybersecurity risks? Develop, implement and maintain a retirement plan cybersecurity risk management strategy. The critical components of such a strategy may be divided into three broad categories: (1) development and maintenance of the strategy, (2) management of third-party risks, and (3) evaluation of enterprise and plan-specific insurance coverages and consideration of whether specialized cybersecurity insurance should play a role in the strategy.

1. Development and maintenance of a cybersecurity risk management strategy.

  • Consider a framework on which to base the strategy. Possibilities include the NIST framework, SAFETY Act, and industry-based initiatives, including SPARK Institute and the AICPA. In most cases, retirement plan cybersecurity risk management ideally is integrated with the cybersecurity strategy of the entity’s core business.
  • Own the strategy. Identify and document who has what responsibilities for strategy implementation and updating within the organization.
  • Understand the data. What is it, what is it used for, where is it stored? How is data accessed? Is access properly controlled and limited to those personnel who need access? When and how is data encrypted? Is the data collected limited to only what is minimally required? What data needs to be retained and when should it be destroyed?
  • Consider whether an external certification, such as an AICPA Service Organization Control 2 (SOC2) report, is an appropriate measure to enhance security compliance and streamline testing procedures. Determine the frequency and type of systems testing, which might include threat detection, penetration testing, testing of backup and recovery plans, and systems resiliency testing. Establish how often and to whom the testing results should be provided, and how reports will be memorialized in the plan’s official records.
  • Require screening and background checks of new personnel with direct or indirect access to benefit plan data, and provide ongoing cybersecurity training.

2. Third-Party Risk Management.

  • Identify all service providers and their vendors with access to plan data, and request and evaluate their cybersecurity programs and controls, including encryption and transmission protocols. Determine whether the service provider uses any external review of controls, such as SOC2 reports or industry certifications. Consider the frequency and manner for monitoring service providers’ cybersecurity systems, and whether testing is appropriate to assess service provider risk and compliance.
  • Review, and amend as necessary, service provider agreements to ensure there are appropriate contractual obligations for data protection and a fair allocation of liability risk. Consider the extent to which the agreement should address compliance with applicable data privacy laws, relevant industry standards or certifications, requirements regarding data encryption and destruction of data, obligations of the parties in the event of a cybersecurity breach, and the extent of service provider’s liability for cybersecurity breaches.
  • Determine the level and type of insurance coverage the service provider maintains, including the extent of coverage provided for cybersecurity breaches, and whether and to what extent third-party loses are covered.

3. The role of insurance.

Traditional liability, errors and omissions, directors and officers, ERISA bonds and fiduciary coverages may not cover, or provide only limited coverage, for a cybersecurity breach. Evaluate existing coverage in light of a plan for cybersecurity risk assessment and determine whether cybersecurity insurance will operate efficiently to address gaps in other coverages. Cybersecurity insurance is still an evolving segment of the insurance industry, and policies should be carefully reviewed to determine the type and scope of coverage, policy and individual incident limits, and other important terms and limitations of the coverage.

Final Considerations

Eliminating all risk of cyber attacks is not a realistic goal, so plan sponsors and fiduciaries instead should focus on developing a reasonable and proportionate response to the risk of a cybersecurity breach of plan data. While the question remains whether the responsibility to address cybersecurity risks is a fiduciary duty under ERISA, the loss of employee personal information due to a breach nevertheless could result in serious costs and other consequences, including possible third-party liability, fines, notifications and required remediation under state and other federal laws. Additionally, a breach of employee data is almost certain to leave losses of productivity and lowered workplace morale in its wake. Therefore, prudent plan sponsors and fiduciaries should develop a cybersecurity risk management strategy specific to and appropriate for their benefit plans, leveraging where possible existing cybersecurity efforts in the sponsor’s core business.

Gene Griggs, an attorney no longer with Poyner Spruill, was the original author of this article.

Physical Address: 301 S. College Street, Suite 2900, Charlotte, NC 28202

related information

what's new at the firm

McIntyre Leadership Challenge Excites, Ignites, and Inspires Youth

7/12/2017

Mike McIntyre recently announced at the NC Bar Association Annual Meeting, his new Youth Leadership Challenge. The Youth Leadership program will provide opportunities for civic engagement to High School students and community leadership.

Webinar: ERISA Fiduciaries, Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Risks: HIPAA, HITECH, and ERISA Preemption of State Data Breach Laws

6/20/2017

This CLE webinar will provide guidance to employee benefits counsel on trends in data breaches for ERISA healthcare and retirement plans, lessons from recent BCBS/Anthem litigation, ERISA fiduciary obligations, ERISA preemption of state data breach laws, and contractual risk mitigation with third-party administrators (TPAs).

Poyner Spruill Attorneys Honored by Chambers USA in Seven Practice Areas

6/2/2017

RALEIGH - Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business has ranked seven practice areas and sixteen Poyner Spruill LLP attorneys as leaders in their respective fields. Poyner Spruill received rankings, which identify the firm as a leader in North Carolina, for outstanding work in the following practice areas:

Charlie Davis Joins Poyner Spruill

6/1/2017

Charles E. “Charlie” Davis III has joined Poyner Spruill as an associate attorney practicing in the areas of estate and trust planning and administration, taxation, and business law.

Brett A. Carpenter joins Poyner Spruill

6/1/2017

Raleigh, NC – Brett A. Carpenter has joined Poyner Spruill’s Raleigh office as an associate, with a focus on helping clients with labor and employment law matters.