publications full of ideas
North Carolina Medicaid Provider Enrollment: To Disclose or Not to Disclose, That is the Question
A Trap for the Unwary


The use of criminal background checks is becoming more prevalent as a form of credentialing for both individual and institutional health care providers seeking licensure, certification or the benefits of other government licensing and payment agencies. Specifically, criminal background checks are now routinely used by professional licensing board and payment entities to determine which providers have the privilege of practicing their craft and being paid for their services. One area where we are seeing criminal background checks have a significant impact is Medicaid provider enrollment, and the process impacts every type of provider seeking certification by the state’s Medicaid program.

In North Carolina, Medicaid providers must complete a lengthy list of disclosure and sanction questions during the application process dealing with convictions, disciplinary actions, and civil monetary penalties, for example. Applicants often do not pay careful attention to these questions, including the scope and time parameters, contained in them. Similarly, applicants tend to move quickly through the questions and assume that nothing in their past would require disclosure. This conduct can lead to inadvertent errors which can have significant ramifications for the processing time and ultimate eligibility as a Medicaid provider. It is essential that applicants take their time and closely examine the questions and the above metrics.

For instance, while the North Carolina Medicaid enrollment application asks about health care-specific fraud and abuse convictions, findings and sanctions, it also asks about any convictions other than minor traffic violations. This question is very broad in both scope and time. First, the scope involves any conviction, including a felony or a misdemeanor, for any reason, other than a minor traffic violation. Second, it is important to note that there is no time period in the question. The time parameter is nonexistent so even a thirty, forty, fifty year old conviction would be subject to the disclosure requirements.

Why is it important to carefully and properly answer the sanction questions – because of the subsequent criminal background check. Typically, a provider enrollment application is prepared and submitted by the applicant or the applicant’s attorney. After submission of the application and as part of the review process, a criminal background check is performed on the owners, managing employees and agents. If there is a “hit” on the criminal background check, the agency gets the report and the applicant does not know what it shows. If the conviction that caused the “hit” was not disclosed on the application and supporting documentation provided, the application is subject to a denial based on the failure to disclose. Then, the applicant either needs to engage in a time consuming process to either attempt to have the application withdrawn to avoid a denial, or in the worst case, receive a denial, which then triggers additional disclosure requirements on a subsequent application. If the provider applicant is successful in withdrawing the application, or the application is denied, the applicant will have to start the enrollment process from the beginning and re-apply, with the appropriate disclosure, and supporting documentation. If the application was denied, the applicant will also need to provide an explanation of why the conviction was not originally disclosed on the prior application. Either of these scenarios causes delays in the processing time of the application and subsequent approval. Any delay in approval could have serious repercussions for the provider because of the length of time necessary for the application to be processed. Remember, a provider cannot submit claims for reimbursement or be paid by Medicaid for claims until the provider has successfully enrolled.

The fact that a provider enrollment application contains an affirmative response to a disclosure or sanction question does not necessarily mean that the application will be denied. For purposes of Medicaid provider enrollment in North Carolina, the Division of Medical Assistance has discretion to approve an application if it is in the best interest of the integrity of the Medicaid program based upon consideration of the seriousness, age, and other circumstances involving the conviction.

When a provider applicant answers “yes” to one of the disclosure or sanction questions, it is essential to attach documentation explaining the reason for the response. North Carolina Medicaid requires that an applicant submit copies of the documents reflecting the disclosable activity which also shows the final disposition or resolution. In addition, this is the applicant’s opportunity to not only identify what the conviction or licensing issue was, but also to explain it, provide the circumstances, and provide any facts to mitigate the issue and support enrollment as a provider. A provider applicant will want to demonstrate that its enrollment is in the best interest of the Medicaid program and address the seriousness, age, and circumstances surrounding the event.

Generally, an enrollment problem with the criminal background check is caused by the failure to disclose a conviction, rather than the conviction itself. The failure to disclose often ends up being a more significant issue than the underlying offense. When answering disclosure and background check questions, it is critically important to be careful, thoughtful and comprehensive. If you are unsure how to answer a criminal background check question, seek competent advice from counsel before proceeding. Forewarned is forearmed.

Physical Address: 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601

related information

what's new at the firm

Two Poyner Spruill Attorneys Help Work for Tomorrow through Mentor Program at UNC Law


RALEIGH, NC – Founded in 2016, the McIntyre-Whichard Legal Fellows Program is now in its second year of existence at the University of North Carolina School of Law. The program was founded by two UNC Law School alums and is co-sponsored by the North Carolina Study Center and the UNC Christian Legal Society. The program is named after Poyner Spruill partner and former U.S. Congressman Mike McIntyre and former N.C. Supreme Court Justice Willis Whichard, who are both alums of the university and serve as program mentors.

Poyner Spruill Diversity Committee to host panel discussion with key leaders in the legal field to celebrate Black History Month


The Poyner Spruill Diversity Committee is celebrating Black History Month by hosting an intimate panel discussion with key leaders who have been successful in the legal field.

Twenty-three Poyner Spruill Attorneys Honored by Super Lawyers in 2018


RALEIGH, NC – Poyner Spruill is pleased to announce that 16 of its attorneys have been recognized as 2018 North Carolina Super Lawyers and 7 were named as 2018 North Carolina Rising Stars by North Carolina Super Lawyers Magazine.

Poyner Spruill’s Client Service & Strategy Manager to Present at the 2018 Festival of Legal Learning


RALEIGH, NC – Poyner Spruill’s Manager of Client Service & Strategy, Brandi Hobbs, has been invited to present at the University of North Carolina School of Law’s 2018 Festival of Legal Learning. The festival will take place February 9-10 at The William & Ida Friday Continuing Education Center in Chapel Hill.

Poyner Spruill files amicus brief with U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of European business organizations


RALEIGH, NC — Led by partner Saad Gul, the law firm of Poyner Spruill LLP filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of five European business organizations, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold a lower court’s ruling preventing officials from accessing specific private emails housed on a server in Ireland.